for many years, the "Yamaha Rigging Guide" document included this section
[/url]
and later on the page this:
Putting aside the possible confusion in sementics
(does one lower the pressure? or increase the vacuum?)
and Boscoe's stance that there is no such thing as vacuum anyway
(I think that is what he has expressed)
I think we know what Yamaha means here.
The point I am raising: I don't believe them
Why would a "larger filter" be more restrictive to flow ?
with a larger surface area of the same type/porosity of filter media
I would expect a larger filter to - if anything -
have less resistance for the same volume of liquid movement
[/url]
and later on the page this:
Putting aside the possible confusion in sementics
(does one lower the pressure? or increase the vacuum?)
and Boscoe's stance that there is no such thing as vacuum anyway
(I think that is what he has expressed)
I think we know what Yamaha means here.
The point I am raising: I don't believe them
Why would a "larger filter" be more restrictive to flow ?
with a larger surface area of the same type/porosity of filter media
I would expect a larger filter to - if anything -
have less resistance for the same volume of liquid movement
Comment