A switch is a switch is a switch. I think that we all agree on that.
The question is, when a switch in not opened and closed manually (or turned off and on manually) but is used remotely to "sense" something, is it inappropriate or flat out wrong to call it a "sensor"?
And if it is inappropriate/wrong to call it a "sensor", with the understanding that it must be called a "switch" at all times, what is the rationale for treating a "switch" differently from a potentiometer, a variable resistor (mechanically activated or temperature sensitive), and other types of electrical devices that are are or are not comprised of switches?
What makes a standalone switch so special that it has to be treated differently?
The question is, when a switch in not opened and closed manually (or turned off and on manually) but is used remotely to "sense" something, is it inappropriate or flat out wrong to call it a "sensor"?
And if it is inappropriate/wrong to call it a "sensor", with the understanding that it must be called a "switch" at all times, what is the rationale for treating a "switch" differently from a potentiometer, a variable resistor (mechanically activated or temperature sensitive), and other types of electrical devices that are are or are not comprised of switches?
What makes a standalone switch so special that it has to be treated differently?
Comment