Boscoe's post about 2-stroke waste spark didn't hold much interest for me;
I've never believed a 2-stroke engine can actually work - the very idea is implausible.
But it reminded me of another mystery,
and that is the injection timing of Yamaha 4-strokes
As described in the F150 SM:
So: fuel is injected on the compression stroke. Quite right.
but WTF?
Half of the fuel is injected on the exhaust stroke ?
Hello? "allows a simpler fuel injection control system"
No doubt it does.
But how in the world can it not - at best - literally "waste" 1/2 the fuel
and even detract from the energy produced on the power stroke
by making "more work" for the piston on the exhaust stroke?
I've never believed a 2-stroke engine can actually work - the very idea is implausible.
But it reminded me of another mystery,
and that is the injection timing of Yamaha 4-strokes
As described in the F150 SM:
So: fuel is injected on the compression stroke. Quite right.
but WTF?
Half of the fuel is injected on the exhaust stroke ?
Hello? "allows a simpler fuel injection control system"
No doubt it does.
But how in the world can it not - at best - literally "waste" 1/2 the fuel
and even detract from the energy produced on the power stroke
by making "more work" for the piston on the exhaust stroke?
Comment