The above can be categorized as *****ing because the OP's thread has been hijacked. But I believe it is not *****ing because it is not malicious, it is not deliberately trying to attack or "set" anyone up; it is not argumentative, but it is arguing. All sorts of professions argue, it is part of their work: lawyers, scientists, polititions, researchers etc.etc. Arguing is good.
Things sometimes need to travel around a bit to get to the nubb.
The last point does start to bring it back to the OP, it is actually pertinent but way way out of the scope of the OP's question, again perhaps *****ing becoming self interest. But it is not malicious. To be called a ***** I regard as offensive, when it is used to be meant as derogatory as this term seems to have become.
Things sometimes need to travel around a bit to get to the nubb.
The last point does start to bring it back to the OP, it is actually pertinent but way way out of the scope of the OP's question, again perhaps *****ing becoming self interest. But it is not malicious. To be called a ***** I regard as offensive, when it is used to be meant as derogatory as this term seems to have become.
Comment