O.K., my book for my 1999 C90 Yamaha says the compression ratio for cylinder #1 is 5.76:1, cylinder #2 is 5.67:1, cylinder #3 is 5.86:1......why the differences?....Are these differences created by simply different ports?......Surely somebody knows about this!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
C90 compression ratios
Collapse
X
-
The book is a sales catalog from 2008 showing all models and specifications.....the motors with varying compression ratios are the 200 2.6L HPDI, the 175 2.6L V-Max
HPDI, the 150 2.6LV-Max HPDI and my C90 model.....all other motors in the line up have consistent compression ratios in all cylinders. I've just always been curious about this???
Any ideas?
Comment
-
your "sales " book is simply wrong.
way more models than that have a varying compression and for a lot of other year models.
it is not like you have the ability to verify it.
that is why when doing a compression test you will note 7-10 psi difference when going from 1 to 3.
Comment
-
Yamaha is known to be loose with their data. I suspect that the document you have is simply in error. Below is a snippet from the 1999 PIG (Product Information Guide) which indicates a compression ratio of 5.9/1 for all three cylinders. This agrees with the service manual.
If I had to guess how the CR varies from cylinder to cylinder, if and when it does, I would suspect it is the way that the head is cut. Particularly if the pistons are all the same part number.
Comment
-
I have never come across anyone that had a good reason for varying compression ratios amongst cylinders on the same motor. Seems there must be a good reason for doing it but the why is the mystery. Why on some motors and not on other motors?
However Yamaha has a knack for doing some stuff that simply defies all logic.
Comment
-
Comment